Assets in 529 College Tuition Plan are Not Considered Available Resources of the Over Age 18 Beneficiary

A recent question has arisen regarding whether or not assets held in a 529 College Savings Plan (“Qualified Tuition Program”) for the benefit of a beneficiary who is disabled over eighteen years of age will be treated as a “resource” by either or both SSI (Supplemental Security Income) or Medicaid.

Some parents establish a 529 Plan for a young child in anticipation of saving for the child’s future (and the presumed need for) post-high school education expenses at a college or university.  Years later, due to illness, injury, developmental delays, or disabilities, it may become apparent to the parent that the child would not likely be able to attend college or university but instead does then, or shortly will, need to apply for and receive public benefits like SSI and/or Medicaid.  Will those funds held in a 529 Plan contributed by the parents (or others) now hinder, or even prevent, the beneficiary from being able to obtain SSI and Medicaid, if the beneficiary would otherwise qualify for those benefits??

Social Security has issued a POM which addresses how College Savings Plans are to be treated by the SSA.  The POM is found at SI 01140.150, entitled “Qualified Tuition Programs” (QTPs).  Included in the provisions of this POM is the specific finding that, since the 529 is deemed to be “owned” by the person establishing the account, it is therefore not owned by the beneficiary and, therefore, should not be deemed a resource of the disabled beneficiary.  This is great news for the beneficiary.  In fact, the parent (who is normally the custodian of the account) can use the funds to benefit the beneficiary in certain circumstances for educational needs without having the transfer the assets into an ABLE Account (see blog post), or into another alternative, such as a Medicaid Payback Trust [e.g., (d)(4)(A) or (d)(4)(C)].

In addition, the 529 Plan does not require any “Medicaid payback” to the state Medicaid program since the assets held in the 529 Plan are not deemed to be owned by and are not, therefore, “resources” of the beneficiary.

The recently passed “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” expanded the use of 529 Plans for expenditures for K-12 tuition, thus making the assets available for educational purposes of a younger disabled person who may not qualify for college or university.  After completion of whatever educational needs the beneficiary has, the new tax act does allow 529 Plans to be rolled over into an ABLE account.

Using the funds in the 529 Plan to benefit the disabled beneficiary, without damaging the beneficiary’s public benefits and without incurring a Medicaid “payback” at the death of the beneficiary, is a two-fold benefit, a real “win/win.”
 

Curtis J. Shacklett, Esq.

Barber & Bartz, P.C.

525 S. Main St., Ste. 800

Tulsa, OK 74103-4511

Telephone: (918) 599-7755

Facsimile: (918) 599-7756

Email: cshacklett@barberbartz.com

Website: www.barberbartz.com

CAN A SPECIAL NEEDS TRUST BE THE BENEFICIARY OF AN IRA? (Part I)

The accumulated assets in many families often include some form of a retirement account, such as an IRA, 401-k, or qualified pension plan (herein IRA).  Designating a disabled child as the direct beneficiary of an IRA is not advised for several fairly obvious reasons.  First, the entitlement to the IRA account by the disabled child will normally cause an immediate loss of SSI and/or Medicaid benefits unless spent down immediately or withdrawn from the IRA (income taxes being withheld) and transferred into one form or another of a Medicaid Payback Trust [(d)(4)(A) or (d)(4)(C)].  Secondly, if the child is mentally disabled, the mere availability of the funds to the disabled child may result in his/her misspending the funds or being exploited by others.

To solve or avoid these problems, it is possible to name a trust to be the recipient or beneficiary of the IRA.  There are two basic types of trusts that are used in conjunction with the IRA.  One is called a “conduit” trust and the other is an “accumulation” trust.  A conduit trust is designed to receive the “Minimum Required Distribution” (MRD) from the IRA which are yearly distributions of a fraction of the balance in the IRA based upon the child’s remaining life expectancy.  When the trust receives the yearly distribution from the IRA, the Trustee immediately distributes the funds received to the disabled beneficiary.  A conduit trust avoids the risk of a disabled person using the IRA all at once if he/she were named directly as the beneficiary.  However, the annual MRD coming into and then out of the Trust to the disabled beneficiary may harm the receipt of public benefits received by the disabled person depending on whether or not the beneficiary was receiving SSI and/or Medicaid.  One solution to this problem is the use of an “accumulation” trust to receive and hold onto the MRD received by the Trust from the IRA without being required to make a distribution of the MRD to the disabled beneficiary.  Holding on to the MRD avoids disqualifying the disabled beneficiary from receipt of SSI or Medicaid but may have negative income tax consequences.  There are usually ways to avoid the more negative tax consequences with a carefully drafted accumulation trust.  The ins and outs of an accumulation trust will be addressed in my next blog post. 

Curtis J. Shacklett, Esq.
Barber & Bartz, P.C.
525 S. Main St., Ste. 800
Tulsa, OK 74103-4511
Telephone: (918) 599-7755
Facsimile: (918) 599-7756
Email: cshacklett@barberbartz.com
Website: www.barberbartz.com

CAN THE TRUSTEE OF A SPECIAL NEEDS TRUST EMPLOY A PARENT OF A DISABLED CHILD AS A CAREGIVER FOR THAT CHILD?

I have been asked this question numerous times by professional trustees and parent-trustees of special needs trusts (“SNT”). The answer is: “it depends.”

First of all, an SNT established by a parent or other “third party” and not funded by assets belonging to the disabled person is not subject to the “sole benefit” rule that governs what are called “first party” SNT’s.  A first party SNT is one that is statutorily authorized and is established for the sole benefit of the disabled person and funded with assets/resources that belong to the disabled person.  This type of trust is a “Medicaid pay-back” trust and the assets contained in it are not treated as an available resource to the disabled person and thus do not hinder receipt of SSI and/or Medicaid.  However, these first party trusts (sometimes called d4A trusts) must be established for the “sole benefit” of the disabled person and no other person can be a co-beneficiary with the disabled person as long as the disabled person is alive.  It is this “sole benefit” rule that gets in the way of providing compensation to a parent as a caregiver.

Generally, the law requires a parent to care for his/her minor child (whether disabled or not) without any compensation for doing so.  Sometimes, however, if both parents are working, and in particular, if they are doing so because of economic necessity, it creates considerable hardship if substantial expense is incurred for specialized care-giving services for a live-at-home disabled child.  This may result in not much economic benefit to one of the parents for continuing to work, when much of the income from employment is spent on caregivers. In addition, a parent may feel (and often does) that he/she can provide far better care giving services to their disabled child than those they would otherwise hire to provide care.  Thus, two questions arise: (1) “Can I quit my job, stay at home with and take care of my disabled child, and be compensated from my disabled child’s Medicaid-payback SNT?”; and (2) “If, so, how much can I be paid?”

If the disabled child is an adult (i.e., of legal age-i.e. at least 18 years old), there is currently no requirement by SSA (Social Security Administration) or Medicaid to provide care and support for that child by the parent.  Thus, obtaining consent or approval by SSA or Medicaid for parental compensation from the SNT may be more likely to be approved (subject to considerable scrutiny by SSA and Medicaid).  However, if the disabled child is a minor, due to the legal obligation of support placed upon all parents, a parent obtaining consent to be compensated from a first party SNT is far less likely. In addition, because of the “deeming” of income rules by SSA the child may experience a reduction in his/her SSI benefits if the parent is paid from the SNT.  In the event the parent is approved to receive compensation from a first party SNT, in all events the parent could not be paid more than that charged by independent qualified/trained caregivers.  Further,  the parent may not be able to be paid for more than forty (40) hours per week since it will be assumed that the parent can provide care for the child on nights and weekends, etc.  Because the “sole benefit” rules are a potential hindrance to compensation to a care giving parent, and somewhat vague as to how they might apply to specific circumstances, we suggest you check with our office and discuss your particular circumstances before assuming that compensation from a first party SNT to a parent will be allowed. (also see SSA POMS: SSI 01120.201F)

Curtis J. Shacklett

Barber & Bartz

525 S. Main, Suite 800

Tulsa, OK 74103

(918)599-7755

cshacklett@barberbartz.com