Thursday, May 18, 2017

NEW GUARDIANSHIP STATUTE ELIMINATES “GAP” AND TIME DELAY IN APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN FOR DISABLED MINOR APPROACHING ADULT AGE



On May 2, 2017, Oklahoma Governor Mary Fallin signed HB2247 authorizing the filing of a petition and conducting of a hearing for appointment of a guardian for a disabled minor child within ninety (90) days prior to the child reaching age eighteen (18).  Prior to the passing of this new statute, the parents of the disabled child were required to wait until the child reached his/her 18th birthday before being permitted to file a petition and thereafter (approximately 30 days following the date of filing) having a hearing to seek appointment of a guardian over their now adult disabled child.

Under the new statute there will be no “gap” or lag time between the child arriving at age 18 and the date of a hearing on the matter, since the court order under this new procedure will become effective automatically when the child reaches 18.  Under the existing law, no petition for a disabled child was permitted to be filed until after the child turned 18, thus causing a “gap” in time during which no guardian was in place until a hearing was conducted, usually within a month after filing the petition. 

This new procedure will relieve the minds of many parents who have expressed concern to me about something happening during the “gap” period when no guardian has yet to be appointed because the hearing to appoint a guardian has not yet occurred but their child has already reached age 18. 

With the new statute, though parental authority technically ceases when the child reaches 18, if the new statutory procedure is implemented after a hearing is conducted (sometime during the 90 days prior to the child reaching the age of 18), the parents will become guardians on the child’s 18th birthday and there will then be no loss of authority/watch-care over their disabled child, a welcome relief to many parents.

The statute becomes effective November 1, 2017. 

Curtis J. Shacklett, Esq.
Barber & Bartz, P.C.
525 S. Main St., Ste. 800
Tulsa, OK 74103-4511
Telephone: (918) 599-7755
Facsimile: (918) 599-7756

Thursday, December 8, 2016

CONGRESS PASSES “SPECIAL NEEDS TRUST FAIRNESS ACT”



The U. S. Senate recently passed H.R. 34, which included a much needed but simple addition to the existing OBRA 1993 statute, which established Medicaid pay-back trusts for the benefit of persons with disabilities.  A Medicaid “Pay-Back” Trust allows a disabled person who is receiving public benefits, such as SSI and/or Medicaid benefits, to place excess funds in a Medicaid Pay-Back Trust without those funds or assets being treated as “excess resources” resulting in a loss of SSI and/or Medicaid. 

The original “(d)(4)(A)” statute [a recitation of a part of the Congressional Act authorizing such trusts, e.g., 42 U.S.C. 1396p(d)(4)(A)], allowed the establishment of such a trust only by a “parent, grandparent, guardian, or the court” and did not authorize the disabled individual him or herself to establish such a trust even if competent to do so.

Apparently there was an unfair or naïve assumption that all disabled persons lacked the capacity to establish a trust on their own, or there simply was a drafting oversight by Congress in the original statute.

The new “Fairness in Medicaid Supplemental Needs Trusts” Act only adds two substantive words to the existing statute; it adds “the individual” to the list of persons authorized to establish a (d)(4)(A) MedicaidPay-Back Supplemental Needs Trust, in addition to a parent, grandparent, guardian, or the Court.

This simple change will eliminate the burden and expense associated with having to go through court proceedings if there was no parent or grandparent available or willing to establish a (d)(4)(A) trust for the benefit of a disabled adult.

The new Act reads as follows:

(a)  In General.—Section 1917(d)(4)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396p(d)(4)(A) is amended by inserting “the individual,” after “for the benefit of such individual by”.

(b)  Effective Date.—The amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply to trusts established on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

The House of Representatives previously passed this statute and now, with Senate approval and President Obama’s anticipated signing of the bill, a hurdle has been removed for competent disabled persons being able to establish, by themselves, a Medicaid Pay-Back Supplemental Needs Trust to promote their welfare and benefit their lives. 


Curtis J. Shacklett, Esq.
Barber & Bartz, P.C.
525 S. Main St., Ste. 800
Tulsa, OK 74103-4511
Telephone: (918) 599-7755
Facsimile: (918) 599-7756
Email: cshacklett@barberbartz.com
Website: www.barberbartz.com

Wednesday, August 19, 2015

Trustees: Don’t Give a Debit Card to a Beneficiary of a Medicaid Pay-back Trust!


On July 27, 2015, a Federal District Court in Pennsylvania (Elias v. Colvin, 2015 WL 4529877, M.D. Pa July 27, 2015) ruled that if an individual can direct the use of a trust’s corpus (i.e., principal) the trust should be deemed an available or countable resource to the individual for purposes of SSI (Supplemental Security Income) purposes.
 

In this case, the individual beneficiary was provided a debit card allowing her direct access to her first party Special Needs Trust (SNT) (i.e., a Medicaid Payback Trust).  This direct access ended when the trusteeship changed, perhaps indicating that a more enlightened Trustee took over management of the Trust.  The Social Security Administration (SSA) ruled that the debit card granted the beneficiary access to her trust and, therefore, caused the trust to be deemed an available resource to her, thus, causing a loss of her SSI, and a demand for repayment by the SSA for over $18,000 was asserted against the beneficiary.  The decision of the SSA was upheld on an appeal to the Federal District Court.  This case once again warns the Trustees of the major error caused when a beneficiary of a first party Medicaid payback trust is given a debit card tied to the trust account, allowing access to trust assets by the beneficiary. 


Curtis J. Shacklett, Esq.
Barber & Bartz, P.C.
525 S. Main St., Ste. 800
Tulsa, OK 74103-4511
Telephone: (918) 599-7755
Facsimile: (918) 599-7756
Email: cshacklett@barberbartz.com
Website: www.barberbartz.com







Tuesday, March 17, 2015

OKLAHOMA CONVERTS FROM A "209-b" STATE TO AN "SSI" STATE


Oklahoma has changed its status from what has been known as a “209-b” state to conform with the SSI criteria effective March 1, 2015.  A handful of states originally opted not to follow the SSI qualification criteria in evaluating income limitations as well as resource limitations when an applicant applied for Medicaid benefits.  Those fewer states were called “209-b” states.  This was permitted under federal law.  Some have considered the SSI criteria more “liberal” than the 209-b rules in some ways, but perhaps not in other ways.  Oklahoma’s adopting the SSI criteria will help simplify the past regimen of attempting to qualify for both SSI and Medicaid with slightly different rules.  Now those qualifying income/resource rules should coincide.  One change is that disbursements from a trust to purchase clothing will no longer be deemed “income” to the recipient.  This has long been a problem for Trustees needing to periodically purchase clothing for a beneficiary.  Disbursements for food or shelter will continue to be treated as “income” to the beneficiary and therefore could be problematic depending on the income category of the beneficiary.


Curtis J. Shacklett, Esq.
Barber & Bartz, P.C.
525 S. Main St., Ste. 800
Tulsa, OK 74103-4511
Telephone: (918) 599-7755
Facsimile: (918) 599-7756
Website: www.barberbartz.com

Tuesday, December 30, 2014

ANOTHER TOOL IN THE TOOL BOX – The ABLE Act, an Overview

Recently Congress passed and the President has signed into a law a new form of investment account designed to provide a source for accumulation of funds to benefit a disabled person in a way similar to Section 529 accounts used for accumulating funds for qualified tuition programs. 

The “Achieving a Better Life Experience” Act (“ABLE” Act) is designed to benefit disabled persons specifically who are receiving Medicaid and/or SSI. 

The ABLE account is established as part of Section 529 of the Revenue Code and allows a disabled individual to maintain receipt of SSI benefits even though the SSI recipient has an ABLE account that contains assets up to but not exceeding $100,000.00.  If the account grows above that amount, the SSI benefits will be held in suspension until the account drops below $100,000.00, at which time the SSI payments will resume.

Likewise, a Medicaid recipient will not lose eligibility based on assets held in an ABLE account even if the size of the account exceeds $100,000.00.  However, similarly to a (d)(4)(A) trust, the ABLE account is subject to a Medicaid payback provision upon the death of the Medicaid recipient. 

An individual who is receiving SSI or disability benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act is eligible to use an ABLE account for “qualified disability expenses” which include:

·         Education

·         Housing

·         Transportation

·         Employment Support

·         Health and Wellness

The State must create the means to establish the ABLE Account (similarly to 529 accounts) and, although lawmakers have introduced bills, Oklahoma has not yet had time to get that completed.

The ABLE Account provides another relatively simple way of accumulating funds in a significant amount for the benefit of a disabled person, and once it is implemented by the states, it is a potentially useful tool in planning for the long term assistance for a disabled person.  It will take months before the details become clearer on how an ABLE account will work, but it may well be another tool in the estate planning tool box in serving individuals with disabilities.

Curtis J. Shacklett, Esq.
Barber & Bartz, P.C.
525 S. Main St., Ste. 800
Tulsa, OK 74103-4511
Telephone: (918) 599-7755
Facsimile: (918) 599-7756
Website: www.barberbartz.com

Tuesday, November 11, 2014

Must a Trustee Charge Rent to an SSI and/or Medicaid Recipient?

In my blog post of May 3, 2012, I addressed a related and basic question “Can a Special Needs Trust Own a House for the Benefit of a Disabled Person Receiving SSI and/or Medicaid?” 

 This post will address the issue of charging rent to the beneficiary to avoid the loss of SSI and/or Medicaid.  The Social Security POMS set forth at SI 1120.200F speak to this issue as follows:

F.   Policy – Home ownership/purchase of a home by a trust

1.   Home as a Resource

If the trustee of a trust which is not a resource for SSI purposes purchases and holds title to a house as a home for the beneficiary, the house would not be a resource to the beneficiary.  It would also not be a resource if the beneficiary moved from the house.  The trust holds legal title to the house, therefore, the eligible individual would be considered to be living in his or her own home based on having an “equitable ownership under a trust.”
 
If the trust is a resource to the individual, the home is subject to exclusion under SI 01130.100.
 
2.   Rent-free shelter 

An eligible individual does not receive in-kind support and maintenance (ISM) in the form of rent-free shelter while living in a home in which he or she has an ownership interest.  Accordingly, an individual with “equitable home ownership under a trust” (see SI 01120.200F.1.) does not receive rent-free shelter.  Also, because we consider such an individual to have an ownership interest, payment of rent by the beneficiary to the trust has no effect on the SSI payment.  (Emphasis supplied.) 

In the past, the Oklahoma Medicaid program required the Trustee to charge rent to the Medicaid beneficiary in order to avoid the potential loss of Medicaid benefits due to the “receipt” of [phantom] income in the form of free rent.  The “phantom” income would be equal to the fair market rental rate of the dwelling.  However, this rule has been recently changed to follow the same rule as the POMS.  Thus, a Trustee will no longer be forced to charge rent to a disabled beneficiary living in a dwelling held by a trust that was established for the beneficiary.  However, payments by the trust of certain household expenses, will still be deemed “income” to the Medicaid and/or SSI recipient.  Examples of such “household costs” include mortgage payments, real property taxes, and utilities.  However, the Oklahoma Medicaid program does not consider phone, cable TV, internet access, satellite TV, etc., as utilities, and payment of those expenses by a trust for the benefit of a beneficiary will not be treated as “income” to the beneficiary. 

SI 1120.20F.3.C. of the POMS states:

If the trust pays for other shelter or household operating expenses, these payments would be income in the form of ISM (“In-Kind Support and Maintenance”) in the month the individual has use of the item (see SI 00835.350).  Countable shelter expenses are listed at SI 00835.465D (and include such expenses as mortgage payments, real property taxes, and utilities).  [emphasis added] 

If the trust pays for improvements or renovations to the home [owned by the trust], e.g., renovations to the bathroom to make it handicapped accessible or installation of a wheelchair ramp or assistance devises, etc., the individual does not receive income.  Disbursements from the trust for improvements increase the value of the resource and, unlike household operating expenses, do not provide ISM.  (See SI 01120.200E.1.c.) [emphasis added]

In addition to the list of “household costs” recited in the POMS section cited above [SI 00835.465D], there is also this: 

NOTE:  Condominium fees in themselves are not household costs.  However, condominium fees may include charges which are household costs (e.g., garbage removal).  To the extent that such charges are identifiable, use them in the computation of inside and outside ISM.   

However, if the house is not owned by a trust for the benefit of the Medicaid beneficiary but instead by a third party (e.g., parent, sibling, or non-related party) payment of rent by the trustee will be deemed income to the SSI/Medicaid recipient and will likely affect and may cause a loss of those benefits.  Each case must be evaluated carefully so that interference with receipt of public benefits does not occur. 

 
Curtis J. Shacklett
Barber & Bartz
525 S. Main Street, Suite 800
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74103-4511
Telephone: (918) 599-7755
Facsimile: (918) 599-7756
E-mail: cshacklett@barberbartz.com